Svetlana tubes
Svetlana tubes |
Music Man Amps Discussion Forum » Tubes & Substitutions » Svetlana tubes
Author | Message | ||
Larryl Natalini |
I really like Svetlana's, but they seem to go micro- |
||
Steve Kennedy |
JJs are well thought of in most circles as are the Svetlanas. |
||
Michael Kaus |
I have been using JJ's in my 2-10 65 for about six months now and we pretty much work every weekend Fri and Sat. They have been great sounding tubes, so much so that I have all but retired my JBL Twin(too stinking heavy-AND it's in a flight case!), so I am really happy with hem. Check them out at www.eurotubes.com. Bob is real cool and helpful. Tell him you are using them in a MM and he will tell you to use the EL34L's as they are suppose to handle the higher voltages better. Sound great and they are REAL reasonable. Mike Kaus. |
||
carl from AUS |
i have svets, and used over 2 years now, my amp sounds great but the valves rattle. is this the "filiment" (dont know tech name) inside vibrating against the glass? my previous valves did not do this. is this bad? |
||
carl from AUS again. |
what are JJ's? |
||
Langley |
JJ's are a brand of tube that come from |
||
Marc |
The Svetlana information provided in the first post of this thread; |
||
Kdog |
Hey, I have a 210-HD130 that needs tube replacement. |
||
Steve Kennedy (admin) |
It is ALWAYS a good idea to check the bias on a new set of tubes. Buying a matched set ensures that the four tubes will be matched to each other but this has no bearing to how they will perform as a set in YOUR amp. |
||
Kdog |
Hey thanks a lot for the info Steve! This website is an amazing resource. I just had a couple of questions about biasing tubes. |
||
Steve Kennedy (admin) |
The Electro-Harmonix 6CA7 tube DOES look like a close copy of the original Sylvania tube as far as the internal construction goes. It is a bit different in physical shape and probably in the vacuum and "formula" used in creating the emissive materials. |
||
kenneth m. warman |
Hey: not being a tech(just an old hippie musician) I purchased one of those dual bias testers for my early 210-65(has the 12ax7 tube) what should the reading be using a digital mm on the dc mv scale |
||
Michael Kaus |
It really depends on what your actual plate voltage is. The MM's run close to 700v on the plates so you can't bias them like you would an EL34 in a amp with lower voltage. The EL's are considered to be 30 watt max rated tubes so 70% max disp is considered to be the max, so that's 21 watts @70 percent. If you figure out that you have 700v on the plates, that means that you can technically have up to 30mA's of idle current. Trust me, that will probably eat any new production tube out there. The MM amps had a bad habit of eating tubes back when they were new and were using tubes that were a lot more robust than what we have now. A also don't like their 1/2v at point Y theory fromn back then. We do know a little more now about the subject. I bias my MM's at 21-23mA of idle current with no signal and master on zero. I get great tone and just as importantly. THEY LAST. Also, do not buy cheap tubes. It's not needed to buy NOS but get some good ones. The newest JJ E34L's series is what I use and they seem to hold up well. Mike. |
||
kenneth m. warman |
Michael: Thanks for this info. I also bought the electro-harmonix version of the big bottle 6ca7 mentioned above, just wanted to check bias to be sure everythings good. I checked with these new tubes and its at 26ma on one tube 27 on the other I should lower this to your recommendations? |
||
michael kaus |
That's not too bad. It's a little high but probably safe. I would probably lower it if it were mine since my amps gets worked pretty hard for 10-15 hrs per week. If you are a strictly home player with a scattered schedule of playing, it should be all right. I just push mine pretty hard for what they are so I have to bias on the conservative side. Try 23ma-you will probably see no change in tone to speak of and you get to play with your new bias gadget thingy that way. The more you do, the more you learn. JUST BE CAREFUL-these are wild animals and they DOOOOOO bite! Mike. |
||
michael kaus |
For KDOG's question about biasing, if you purchase tubes from a dealer that grades their tubes, you can bias your amp once and then buy the same grade of tubes that pull the same idle current as the one's you have. That way, you can bias once and just order the same tube numbers that you have. The only problem with this is in that you have to get your tubes from THAT DEALER. Anyone else's grading system won't mean squat. Just food for thought. I check/adjust bias on amps even if they are SUPPOSED to be the same number as before. You never know and I would hate to smoke somebody's amp that I was working on because I was lazy! Mike. |
||
Rick |
Hi all, |
||
mike kaus |
Winged c tubes are very good tubes for new production. I have used them and they sounded great too. They did seam to start rattling awful early for me(in the 4 sets I used) so I went with JJ's and have had long life and great tone. Mike. |
||
Peter Maziar (mosfet) Username: mosfet Registered: 11-2006 |
My Svetlana winged Cs rattle too, and they starting doing that at very low hours of usage. I attributed it to the heavy vibration due to the HD150s power, and the 4 built-in 10" speakers. Comments? |
||
Steve Kennedy (admin) Username: admin Registered: 03-2002 |
It sounds as though your speakers are wired properly and 8-ohms is the proper setting for this configuration. |
||
Peter Maziar (mosfet) Username: mosfet Registered: 11-2006 |
Thank you for your response, Steve. I am not afraid of the amps guts, I just am not sure how to check current because of the way Music Man wired these output tubes. Biasing does seem low with these new tubes - they start to distort on very low volume, and my 'old school' tubes never distorted until at least 6 on the pre-amp dial. These tubes are supposedly matched to run at 42mA. I am going to try biasing them by using a scope, and turning up the bias until crossover distortion disappears. I suppose I could measure resistance of the output transformer primary windings, measure voltage drop across them, and calculate current, then I suppose I would have to divide current by two because there are two power tubes on each tap. Would that be right? Please let me know if that makes sense. I will be posting my findings here in any event. |
||
Peter Maziar (mosfet) Username: mosfet Registered: 11-2006 |
Biased according to the Music Man service bulletin, which is to say 25mV from the emitter to ground across the 3.9 ohm emitter resistors (the higher of the two not to exceed 55mV), my tubes had pronounced crossover distortion (under-biased), as seen on my scope. Turning up the voltage to 50mV on the higher of the two (the lower of the two was around 36mV) eliminated the crossover distortion. I stopped exactly there. I bet that is good bias for these tubes. |
||
Doug Spears (douglasspears) Username: douglasspears Registered: 10-2008 |
I'm getting a lot of tube rattle from some brand new winged "C" tubes....Russian made. Real bad. Any recommendations of a good "non-rattly/low-rattly" tube? |
||
Bill Traylor (bozzy369) Username: bozzy369 Registered: 02-2008 |
Doug ,it does sound like you have some real rf stuff happening here,it could be the tubes,but musicman amps have always been abit rf sensitive,make sure every ground is intact and working ,also this site has updates from musicman reguarding the rf prob and how to fix it .so try that ,maybe new tubes,i've even heard of guys lining thier chasis with aluminum or copper foil ,like sheilding a guitar,if you have a close tv,floresant lights stuff like that your amp will let you know . |
||
Peter Maziar (mosfet) Username: mosfet Registered: 11-2006 |
Doug, my winged Cs rattle too, which is a shame - they sound great once biased to minimize crossover distortion. C'est la vie. Regarding the reverb buzz, my HD150 did the same thing, but I managed to eliminate the noise by cleaning and crimping the RCA reverb connectors. I also cleaned the reverb pot with contact cleaner. If nothing else helps, you may need to replace the wiring and connectors to reverb tank. I hope this helps. |
||
Mike Kaus (mm210) Username: mm210 Registered: 05-2006 |
You know, it's a shame I keep hearing about "C" tubes rattling. It does seem to be just the EL's though. Great sounding tubes, just not real rugged. I STILL swear it depends on where they're shipped from and how. On a nothe note, the JJ's hold up for me and mine. I nkow peole who swear by Ruby's but I've had NO luck with them. Go figure. |
||
Chuck Bryden (cbryden) Username: cbryden Registered: 12-2006 |
+1 for the JJ tubes. I have had mine in my amp for over two years, biased to about .49 volts at the magic point, just gone through a year of gigging at least once a week, I play loud, early on I used an attenuator to crank the amp and leave the volume low, and they are still kicking and sound great. |
||
Anthony Hennessy (franzoni) Username: franzoni Registered: 01-2008 |
i bought a set of JJ KT 77's for my HD130 2x12 when i was changing the caps... i noticed a very,very slight hum if you put your ear up close to the speaker but thats how faint it is....i also got the reverb back working so it could also be something to do with that but it's so faint i'm not too bothered..i,m very happy with the sound out of the amp..i also went with JJ's on the filter caps..i don't know if it's the valves or the new caps but the tone is really sweet with loads of twang and shimmer without the ickpick treble i used to get sometimes...before the amp went kaput i was even considering a speaker change to see if it would help...!!! don't need to do that now.....on a side note i read in a post this forum somewhere that the speaker jack on these amps can be a ticking timebomb for going belly up,so as a precaution i rewired the speaker cable with some good quality speaker cable and a brand new neutrik angled jack plug..... |