2100-130
2100-130 |
Music Man Amps Discussion Forum » Urgent Requests for Help! » 2100-130
Author | Message | ||
Scott Myrick (htrboy) Username: htrboy Registered: 01-2009 |
Hi, |
||
Mike Kaus (mm210) Username: mm210 Registered: 05-2006 |
Most of the time, the op amps themselves are just junk. They're cheap, plug it in and see if it cures it. I assume that you DID measure the cathode driver resistors BEFORE you started passing the signal through it. Did THAT correct your problem with the current draw? Yup-thatt's the cap. |
||
Scott Myrick (htrboy) Username: htrboy Registered: 01-2009 |
Regarding the cathode driver resistors - nope, I dint. While I've got an edumacation in electronics, I don't, as they say, have the street smarts. So on the schematic it calls for 470 ohms each - two measured approximately 390 ohms, and two measured around 480 ohms - that seems like it would imbalance the bias pretty well, yes (tho they're still within 10%)? I've got an NE 5532 coming (no local source) and will give it a go. |
||
Scott Myrick (htrboy) Username: htrboy Registered: 01-2009 |
By the way - thanks for the reply! |
||
Scott Myrick (htrboy) Username: htrboy Registered: 01-2009 |
Oops - I wrote that last post at the end of a long day - 390 is not within 10%. I guess I'll be replacing those. When I was checking components, I was looking for obvious shorts or opens, and didn't pay too much attention to how close they were to correct value. Now that I'm checking the values, quite a few of those resistors are drifting. |
||
Mike Kaus (mm210) Username: mm210 Registered: 05-2006 |
Yeah ut remember, MSOT of the resistors back then were 20% resistors(yaeh, I'm old). That isn't that far off. Id be more concerned about the shorts and the low gain first. I would get too anal about thteresistors until you find one 10x it's value or something like that. |
||
Mike Kaus (mm210) Username: mm210 Registered: 05-2006 |
Jeez, I shouldn't type before coffee. |
||
Scott Myrick (htrboy) Username: htrboy Registered: 01-2009 |
Thanks for the tips, you're doing better than me - I can't even make sense before coffee. |
||
Scott Myrick (htrboy) Username: htrboy Registered: 01-2009 |
Okay - I set up to measure the bias voltages, and just about had a coronary when I measured about 150mV across the first 390 ohm resistor. I shut it down and double checked my setup, and double checked the value of the resistors - all seemed okay, so I cranked down the trim pot and tried it again. After fooling around with it, here's what I figured out: I started out with the trim pot all the way down, and an imbalanced bias of ~24/7 mV. I creeped the trim pot up, measuring as I went, and got as far as 47 / 19 mV. When I tried to shoot for a high reading of 53 or so, the bias on the high side shot up to about 57mV and the bias on the LOW side shot up to 80mV. At that point I cranked the pot back down, and after 2-3 minutes the bias was back to where I started at ~24 / 7 mV. Does this seem like the bias pot is old and not trustworthy anymore? Or maybe there's a squirly component in there somewhere? Any thoughts are appreciated! |
||
Mike Kaus (mm210) Username: mm210 Registered: 05-2006 |
POt bad is one thing. I would look at the caps on that driver board. There are electrolytic caps on that board that could have dried out over the years. Also, the SS driver could be thresholding so you MIGHT have to replace the driver. Don't have a schem here at hand but the SS components are pretty obvious on that board. Try replacing them if all else fails. Cjeck all resistors leading up to and away from the drivers also. |
||
Scott Myrick (htrboy) Username: htrboy Registered: 01-2009 |
Well, after a lot of drama around my house, I finally have time to work on this amp again. Thankfully, the owner is a friend who hasn't needed it back. |
||
Scott Myrick (htrboy) Username: htrboy Registered: 01-2009 |
Ha! |
||
Scott Myrick (htrboy) Username: htrboy Registered: 01-2009 |
Okay, now I'm lost again!! I replaced the two driver transistors with 2N6488's, fired it up and checked the bias...now I'm sitting at 95 / 105 mV with the adjustment pot all the way down. I'm not sure where to go now. All the other components like grid resistors, caps, diodes associated with the tubes test okay. Help! |
||
Daniel Hall (dan_hall) Username: dan_hall Registered: 01-2009 |
WARNING: words of an uninformed hack follow- |
||
Scott Myrick (htrboy) Username: htrboy Registered: 01-2009 |
The LM1458 op amp is the phase inverter or signal splitter (as I understand it) which sends one phase of the signal to one cathode driver transistor (the ones I'm taking about) and a 180 degree inverted signal to the other cathode driver transistor for a push-pull type amp circuit. For what it's worth, with help of another amp guy I found, I think I'm closing in on the problem, but not quite there yet. |
||
Daniel Hall (dan_hall) Username: dan_hall Registered: 01-2009 |
I was indeed a bit confused, after re-reading the OP I can now see you mean the signal first looks rough after the last preamp opamp, not the PI. When you mentioned plugging in the NE* and TL* replacements there, I thought you might be headed for trouble. But glad to hear you're getting closer. All the best! |