Message Board Suggestions
Message Board Suggestions |
Music Man Amps Discussion Forum » Website Questions, Suggestions & Problems » Message Board Suggestions
Author | Message | ||
Alvin Ward (music_al) Username: music_al Registered: 08-2010 |
I am a new member to the Music Man Amplifier website and after having looked at the Message Board, I would like to offer the following suggestions to improve the message board communications. |
||
Mike Kaus (mm210) Username: mm210 Registered: 05-2006 |
First off, I will say welcome, as you are new guy. THEN, I will say that most of us LIKE the fact that the old stuff is here. This is the ONLY source for MM info OUT THERE. Comments about the equipment, supplies, hell, even just opinions about the screws used in the amp are ALL welcome and invited. This is a a very small group in that the MM amps aren't like Fender amps. They don't have a 60 year lineage and millions upon millions of buyers. These amps weren't around all that long so the numbers are dwindling. It's through the kindness of Steve Kennedy that we have any place at ALL to discuss these amps. I am NOT a moderator of content but if I were, I would want it to stay the way it is. We NEED this information-once it's gone, it's gone. Just my 2c worth. |
||
Bill Traylor (bozzy369) Username: bozzy369 Registered: 02-2008 |
mike i've even found kool stuff in that previous message board stuff,you gotta download it all but it's a trove of info. |
||
Alvin Ward (music_al) Username: music_al Registered: 08-2010 |
Didn't mean to offend anyone, but I think the point has been missed. I didn't say trash everything and start over and that all the old stuff needed to go, but what about the where a guy was looking for a part or had a question 6 years ago, and he didn't get an answer? Reckon he has moved on for now or is still seeking the answer after 6 years? I was just trying to inject some common sense into the message board content. If there is an old thread with meaningful content and discussion then it should be left for all to view or research. Sorry I ruffled the feathers, but sounds like we are sticking to the status quo. |
||
Brian M. Watson (mrroundel) Username: mrroundel Registered: 06-2007 |
The subject of this thread shares something in common with the G&L guitars website. For many years there was a small group of very knowledgeable and helpful contributors who, for the most part, liked the original format. There were, however, a few voices who would occasionally complain about the format being antiquated, and suggested that the website be updated. I can't help but suspecting that many of these folks worked in the IT industry, so they were a bit indoctrinated into believe that one must keep up with the "I.T. Times". While they probably really believed that the site would be improved by becoming "New and Improved", it really turned out not to be the case. Or, if it was the case, the site was improved, but the users didn't. Therefore, site visits from the knowledgeable old guard posters rapidly declined. If you go to that site today, and were familiar with the old posters, you'd see that only about 20% of those contributors consistently contribute. |
||
Bill Traylor (bozzy369) Username: bozzy369 Registered: 02-2008 |
If it isn't broke don't fix it,this site works great for what it needs to do.There is also the Music man Amps on Facebook,everything is linked.Between both you should be able to get whatever you want done. |